Article

Employer cum Director of many fake builder companies wanted in many cheating cases in Delhi and othe

SOUTH DISTRICT Dated: 05.07.16 Ø Employer cum Director of many fake builder companies wanted in manycheating cases in

Accused along with his wife indulged in cheating the innocent people on the pretext of fraudulently

SOUTHDISTRICT Dated: 05/08/16 Ø Accused along with his wife indulged in cheating the innocent

Absconding owner of Dev Manishi Builder arrested.

    PRESS RELEASE SOUTH DISTRICT     Dated: 05.12.16   Absconding ownerof Dev Manishi Builder arrested.   Accused wasdeclared PO by the court in a cheating case.   2 cases ofcheating solved.          

Improvement Trust to pay Rs 7.62 lakh after failing to allocate flat

Improvement Trust to pay Rs 7.62 lakh after failing to allocate flat Harvinder Kaur, Jalandhar |  Updated: Nov 27, 2015 22:50 IST   The complainant under the Consumer Protection Act claimed that he

Improvement Trust to pay Rs 7.62 lakh after failing to allocate flat

Improvement Trust to pay Rs 7.62 lakh after failing to allocate flat Harvinder Kaur, Jalandhar |  Updated: Nov 27, 2015 22:50 IST   The complainant under the Consumer Protection Act claimed that he

Gurgaon court tells builder to refund Rs 1.13 lakh for not handing over plot

Gurgaon court tells builder to refund Rs 1.13 lakh for not handing over plot HT Correspondent, Gurgaon |  Updated: Jan 31, 2016 01:45 IST   A consumer court of Gurgaon has directed a

Dispute with builder? Moving consumer court is your right

Dispute with builder? Moving consumer court is your right Nikhil Sharma, Hindustan Times, Chandigarh |  Updated: Apr 11, 2016 12:23 IST   Consumers can now directly approach the consumer courts in cases —

GMADA told to pay Rs 15,000 for excess deduction

GMADA told to pay Rs 15,000 for excess deduction HT Correspondent, Hindustan Times, Chandigarh |  Updated: Oct 25, 2014 14:34 IST   For deducting excess money while refunding the earnest amount for a

Additional construction not disclosed to buyers unacceptable

Additional construction not disclosed to buyers unacceptable Kanchan Chaudhari, Hindustan Times, Mumbai |  Updated: Feb 06, 2016 19:41 IST A developer cannot put up additional construction, which is not disclosed to flat

Here’s how the Real Estate Bill will benefit buyers

Here’s how the Real Estate Bill will benefit buyers Moushumi Das Gupta, Hindustan Times, New Delhi |  Updated: Mar 10, 2016 20:47 IST   The real estate bill slated for passage in the

‘Builders dominate consumers’

New Delhi: A trial court has ordered registration of a criminal case against a real estate company, observing builders "dominate" the consumers and their projects are seldom delivered on time.

Homebuyers get good news, Rajya Sabha passes Real Estate bill

Homebuyers get good news, Rajya Sabha passes Real Estate bill HT Correspondent, Hindustan Times, New Delhi |  Updated: Mar 10, 2016 22:52 IST   The bill would prohibit unaccounted money from being pumped into

Consumer complaint? Courts aside, social media’s the new activism forum

Consumer complaint? Courts aside, social media’s the new activism forum Gulam Jeelani, Gurgaon |  Updated: Apr 18, 2016 11:17 IST   The best bet for a swift response over a faulty product or

50,000 home-buyers still await homes in Noida

50,000 home-buyers still await homes in Noida Vinod Rajput, Hindustan Times, Noida |  Updated: Apr 19, 2016 12:27 IST   Around 50,000 homebuyers, who booked flats in various realty projects, are facing delayed

Builders Dominate Consumers

Builders dominate consumers’   TNN | Apr 13, 2016, 12.09 AM IST New Delhi: A trial court has ordered registration of a criminal case against a real estate company, observing builders "dominate" the

Builder to pay Rs. 11.7 lakhs to Pune residents for delaying delivery of 2 duplex flats

Builder to pay Rs. 11.7 lakhs to Pune residents for delaying delivery of 2 duplex flats Kanchan Chaudhari, Hindustan Times, Mumbai |  Updated: Sep 22, 2014 22:20 IST   A builder in Pune
Disclaimer User: "Harassed.in" is a steroid on Social Platform to place the worst experience or claims raised by the consumers against malpractice of the brands; who don't care about the consumers.Bridging gap between brands and dis-satisfied consumers.
Lawyer :The lawyer listings on "Harassed.in" do not constitute a referral or endorsement by "Harassed.in". "Harassed.in" is not an advertising service for lawyers. "Harassed.in" is providing legal information for nominal charges. Your access to and use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use.